ATOM_2_NEUTRINO

In his introduction, author Asimov asks, “What is the universe made of? What governs its workings? What is its purpose?” The AV model says our physical universe is made of ideas. Laws govern its workings. Its purpose is to teach its illogical students how to reason logically.

Is this true? Well, everything we know passes through our minds. A mind is not physical, and it cannot interface with that which most people called physical. Does it make any difference? Yes, the author talks of an atomic nucleus. It appears scientists lump everything into a pile in an atom. However, they do not explain how a pile of protons and neutrons can produce a magnetic field in Iron but not in other elements. As seen in the above AV model diagram of a Iron atom, it is easy to arrange the neutrons to produce a magnetic field.

The author talks of a nothing-particle called a neutrino. At first, scientists thought it was a myth, but it turned out to exist. In the AV model, Ray is the neutrino. This means we are talking about different things.

The author talks about the conservation of angular momentum, and the AV model provides a general view. During the compression period before the Big Bang, Space was converting to Shells and Spin. This Spin pertained to all three sizes of Shells. The Shells rotated in the same direction, and the centrifugal force was enormous. However, there was no space for the Shells to expand into. After the Big Bang, many Shells reconverted to Space in a spherical form. This provided the needed space, and a massive explosion occurred. The further an object moves from the center, the slower it rotates. Our sun is no exception. The free neutrons moving deeper into the sun produced eight planets. The free subneutrons in the sun produced two large planets. They all rotate as does our sun. The author mentions that Uranus doesn’t rotate like the other planets. Its axis of rotation seems to be in its orbit about the sun. It may be that a free neutron explosion in Saturn created the planet Pluto. On Pluto’s way into orbit, it glanced off Uranus as it went deeper into space while Uranus changed its axis of rotation.

The author talks about a closed energy system, and the AV model is a closed system. From The Universe, our physical universe is zero in size. From inside, our physical universe appears to be expanding and looks infinite in size. However, it does not expand into anything because ideas are not physical.

When Michelson and Morley failed to detect an Ether field in 1887, everyone assumed space was a void. So, the author asks, “Will energy be conserved under the conditions of the vacuum of outer space, a region far more empty of matter than anything we can reproduce on Earth?” This is the biggest difference between the models of most scientists and the AV model. In the AV model, Space is the main spherical field, and space is a large 3D volume.

Given that the field of Space is a set of points, i.e., the ideas of positions, one can say there is no mass in our physical universe. We have points called the centers of Gravity which we call mass centers. They are points where one field converts to another field. The term mass pertains to a collection of these centers or points.

To better understand this concept of mass, think of a photon. A photon is a point associated with the fields Spin and Ray. That is, a fixed amount of Ray rotates perpendicular to the direction of travel. However, Ray does not rotate like a stick. It converts to the Electro and Magno fields. In these fields, Ray is the amplitude, and Spin is the frequency. A stream of photons produce what is known as an electromagnetic wave. The photons range over our electromagnetic spectrum and include radio waves, visible light and gamma rays to name a few. Now, each photon represents a small amount of energy. So, using a mass-energy equation, one can assign a mass to a photon. Einstein did this and predicted gravity would bend light. Sir Arthur Eddington conducted an experiment to prove this bending of light by gravity. No one thought the Space generated by the sun was pushing the starlight. Is Einstein right?

Well, the author provides the following footnote. “In a transparent medium other than a vacuum, photons travel at lesser velocities. Even air slows them down very slightly. When photons leave a transparent medium, however, and enter vacuum again, their velocity accelerates at once to 3x10 to the tenth power cm/sec once more” Assume the author is correct. What is the source of the energy that accelerates each photon mass instantly to the speed of light? Obviously, there is no such source of energy. In the AV model, a photon has no mass. It originates on the surface of a small Shell and rides the expanding sphere of Space. Likewise, after leaving a transparent medium, the photon rides an expanding sphere of Space. Remember, inward flowing opposing radial lines of Gravity convert to expanding spheres of Space at all mass centers such as those in a transparent medium. Ergo, Einstein was wrong about why but not what.

Gravity is another significant difference. Most scientists think gravity is an attractive force. In the AV model, Gravity is a compressive force. Points at the limit or surface of Space convert to inward flowing lines of Gravity and create the radial field of Gravity. Again, Einstein came up with a different view of space-time and gravity to fit the void of space that only a math major could understand. As for quantum gravity, think about this. In the AV model, there are lines of Gravity. Each line comprises a set of points. However, it doesn’t seem possible for a human to divide a line into a point. It sounds like physicists are trying to reach the starting point for the AV model which seems impossible.